In 1994, a Time/CNN poll asked people whether they
would take a genetic test that could tell them what diseases they were
likely to suffer later in life. Nearly as many people said they would
prefer to remain ignorant (49 percent) as said they would like to know (50
percent).
The decision to undergo testing is a very personal one. It should also
be voluntary. A person should agree to the test only if he or she desires
the information. No one considering a gene test should be pressured into
it by relatives, health care providers, or anyone else.
In addition, unless test results can lead to direct medical benefits,
experts advise parents to avoid making this choice for their children. For
most adult-onset conditions, knowing a child's genetic status will not
affect the course of the disease or its treatment. The decision to have a
gene test should be left to the individual, at a time when he or she is
mature enough to weigh the options and handle the results.
Because the issues are so complex and so new, and the consequences so
profound, the decision to have a genetic test deserves careful preparation
and thought. One pivotal consideration concerns whether or not any action
might be prompted by the test. If the test is positive, are there
opportunities for prevention or early detection?
The decision is especially wrenching for persons confronted with a
disease that can be neither prevented nor cured. In one such situation,
Huntington's disease, many families initially expressed interest in being
tested; however, when the test actually became available, just a tiny
fraction chose to go ahead with it.
The story may be different for breast and colon cancer, where there are
opportunities for prevention, early detection, and treatment. Indeed,
early experience from a breast cancer gene research program indicated that
most of the people who had donated samples for DNA testing chose to learn
the results.